Re: quail

Julian Bradfield writes: > Is there any thought on the future of Quail in XEmacs? Not really. From the user point of view, most XEmacs users use platform input methods (eg, compose keys, AltGr, etc) for non-ASCII characters. Asian users typically have many options (eg, for Japanese I use either Canna or Anthy), and Japanese Quail doesn't work at all because it uses features that were introduced into GNU Emacs specifically to support advanced features in Japanese Quail. I only ever use Quail for the occasional accented character in European names, so I don't know much about it. Maybe Aidan knows a lot more, though.