Re: Moving the packages repo and converting to Mercurial
Michael Sperber wrote:
OK? Comments?
I don't think that #2's drawback about old history is so important.
Another advantage of #2 is that an XEmacs-specific package could switch
to the Mercurial repo as the main one, which would simplify things for
the author.
So that's +1 for #2
--
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta