Re: doxymacs

|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp&gt; writes: Paul> It would be especially cool if the package included not only Paul> doxymacs but doxygen itself; but that may be beyond the Paul> current state-of-the-art in packaging technology. What do the Paul> experts say? SJT> How complex is doxygen? Steve Y already has a package (eicq) SJT> which builds and installs a helper app. And it's awkward inside of Packages to say the least. Because the helper app gets built on my machine so anyone who doesn't share my choices in OS, compiler, libraries etc can't use it. No problem if the users builds the XEmacs package Eicq from source, but the vast majority of users Don't do that. SJT> BTW, is it GPL or can we distribute it under GPL? (I don't SJT> know what's going on at the FSF these days, but I took a look SJT> at Mailman and they say "we recommend running Mailman under SJT> Python 2.0.1 because 2.1/2.2 aren't GPL yet". WTF?! Maybe we SJT> should recommend running XEmacs under Linux because Windows SJT> 2000 isn't GPL yet? That'd get my vote. :-) -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|