Re: Patches for ruby-modes

Stephen> jobs.html is way out of date. I really doubt we have a Stephen> package patch tender anymore (if we ever did :-). OK. So it is up to the reviewers then for the packages that lack a dedicated maintainer. Stephen> Our past experience says that it's important to build a Stephen> package in the XEmacs package tree to ensure consistency, Stephen> especially of inlined code (macros and defsubsts). I know. ;-) I was thinking of maintaining within the package tree but trying to find a procedure that could make it easier for the package tree maintainers. It is hard to know all different modes so just making some small checks, make it build and then let the requester and users beta test it could be a way to handle obscure things without demanding to much labor!? Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta