Re: CVS commit log emails

SY> * Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: SY> Is there much to think about? The committer just needs to not SY> post to xemacs-patches. For that to work, we need to make xemacs-cvs required reading for reviewers, or reviewer patches won't get reviewed. But then we have duplication of non-reviewer patches. Worse, it won't be threaded. I'd like to avoid that. The best I've come up with so far is simply to send xemacs-cvs to xemacs-patches. That still gives you the duplication if a patch is approved and committed as-is, but in theory you can skip it easily if you're using a threading MUA. In practice, that probably won't work OOTB because there's no references header, and the xemacs-cvs subject is autogenerated in a rather uninformative way. My commit logs always have an appropriate reference to xemacs-patches in them, but it's annoying to do. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.