Re: future of quail
On 2011-02-15, David Kastrup <dak(a)gnu.org> wrote:
Vocabulary like "contaminated" belongs in the rhetoric of
free
software's opponents. You might want to consider not feeding _their_
propaganda mills, even when your goals don't match that of the Free
Software Foundation.
Why? The GPL is carefully, deliberately and explicitly designed to
behave like a contaminant (or virus, if you prefer).
There's no advantage in pretending it isn't, whether or not one agrees
with the policy.
If commerce complains about the viral nature of the GPL, the right
answer is to say "yes, and this is why: ....".
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta