Re: Automatic smoketests

Ville> Sounds neat. This, combined with a [HEADS UP] mail to some Ville> list if the build fails would be even better. I'm afraid Ville> that simply setting up the web pages doesn't draw enough Ville> attention... Stephen> Actually, I think they would if (1) the filters are good so that the Stephen> reports are short and "interesting" and (2) there was a summary page Stephen> or frame or so that gave statistics on number of packages, number of Stephen> builds, errors, packages that give the most errors, maintainers whose Stephen> packages _never_ throw errors :-) etc. Stephen> This is a fairly hard problem, it will take a lot of tweaking. But Stephen> something to aim for. sounds like a job for perl :) i have perl skill's if you need them -- XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, Gentoo Devotee | for they are subtle and quick to anger. Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at xemacs.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190>