Re: [AC] [PACKAGES (unsupported)] Fix unsupported build env

Ville> BTW, I have no intention to send unsupported stuff to Ville> xemacs-patches in the future, but did so in this case Ville> because the unsupported area has just been kicked off, the Ville> patch affected other people's (Steve, Simon) stuff too, and Ville> I wasn't 100% sure about it. Stephen> I agree with your reasoning here, Steve's statement was rather Stephen> general. Stephen> I think the infrastructure parts of unsupported (the Makefile, Stephen> XEmacs.rules, etc), _should_ be done publically, but for the moment Stephen> xemacs-design is probably the best place. Stephen> I'll cons up a mailing list later this week. Is xemacs-unsupported OK Stephen> for the name? Or maybe xemacs-contrib? Suggestions welcome. i would go with xemacs-contrib as it sounds a bit better and contrib seems to be a wildly accepted term -- XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger. Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver＠xemacs.org>