Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> wrote:
#3 (Single Perl+Emacs executable): Gross! Go away!
I have a feeling that is what RMS says when people tell him about
XEmacs. The difference between dynamic and static linking is mainly
psychological.
GNU Emacs does a good job satisfying the editing requirements of
Richard Stallman. I thought XEmacs sought to do the same for the rest
of the world, but apparently it is only for the rest of the
Lisp-speaking world. Perhaps we should fork an X^2Emacs that goes the
rest of the way.