Re: Probable bug with dsssl-mode

Ville> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 20:33, Adrian Aichner wrote: Jany> I use xemacs under Linux (debian, uname -a -> Linux figue 2.4.19 #1 Thu Jany> Sep 5 08:36:40 CEST 2002 i686 unknown) and Windows 2000. Jany> I can't use the dsssl-mode, while I am able to use the Jany> lisp-mode on the same files. Jany> If I set the mode by hand and try to swith to highlighting, I get the Jany> following message: Jany> Range must be t or a character: "+-*/.<>!?$%_&~^:" >> Hi Jany, >> please do the following: Ville> [...] Ville> Oops, I investigated this a bit and started a GNU sync but forgot to Ville> post. The offending bit is this: Ville> (setq font-lock-defaults '(dsssl-font-lock-keywords Ville> nil t (("+-*/.<>=?$%_&~^:" . "w")) Ville> beginning-of-defun Ville> (font-lock-mark-block-function . mark-defun))) Ville> Actually my XEmacs 21.4.14 reports a bit differently: Ville> Signaling: (error "Char table range must be t, charset, char, or Ville> vector" "+-*/.<>=?$%_&~^:") Ville> [...] Mine[1] reports this: Signaling: (error "Range must be t or a character" "+-*/.<>=!?$%_&~^:") put-char-table("+-*/.<>=!?$%_&~^:" 2 #s(char-table type syntax data ( (?\^＠ ?\^H) 3 ?\t 0 ?\n 524300 ?\^K 3 (?\^L ?\r) 0 (?\^N ?\^_) 3 ?\ 0 ?! 3 ?\" 7 ?\# 8519811 (?$ ?&) 3 ?\' 128 ?\( (4 . ?\)) ?\) (5 . ?\() (?* ?+) 3 ?\, 128 (?- ?/) 3 (?0 ?9) 2 ?: 3 ?\; 8388619 (?< ?\?) 3 ?＠ 131 (?A ?Z) 2 ?\[ (4 . ?\]) ?\\ 9 ?\] (5 . ?\[) (?^ ?_) 3 ?\` 128 (?a ?z) 2 ?{ (4 . ?}) ?| 2621440 ?} (5 . ?{) (?~ ?ÿ) 3))) simple-set-syntax-entry("+-*/.<>=!?$%_&~^:" 2 #s(char-table type syntax data ( (?\^＠ ?\^H) 3 ?\t 0 ?\n 524300 ?\^K 3 (?\^L ?\r) 0 (?\^N ?\^_) 3 ?\ 0 ?! 3 ?\" 7 ?\# 8519811 (?$ ?&) 3 ?\' 128 ?\( (4 . ?\)) ?\) (5 . ?\() (?* ?+) 3 ?\, 128 (?- ?/) 3 (?0 ?9) 2 ?: 3 ?\; 8388619 (?< ?\?) 3 ?＠ 131 (?A ?Z) 2 ?\[ (4 . ?\]) ?\\ 9 ?\] (5 . ?\[) (?^ ?_) 3 ?\` 128 (?a ?z) 2 ?{ (4 . ?}) ?| 2621440 ?} (5 . ?{) (?~ ?ÿ) 3))) modify-syntax-entry("+-*/.<>=!?$%_&~^:" "w" #s(char-table type syntax data ( (?\^＠ ?\^H) 3 ?\t 0 ?\n 524300 ?\^K 3 (?\^L ?\r) 0 (?\^N ?\^_) 3 ?\ 0 ?! 3 ?\" 7 ?\# 8519811 (?$ ?&) 3 ?\' 128 ?\( (4 . ?\)) ?\) (5 . ?\() (?* ?+) 3 ?\, 128 (?- ?/) 3 (?0 ?9) 2 ?: 3 ?\; 8388619 (?< ?\?) 3 ?＠ 131 (?A ?Z) 2 ?\[ (4 . ?\]) ?\\ 9 ?\] (5 . ?\[) (?^ ?_) 3 ?\` 128 (?a ?z) 2 ?{ (4 . ?}) ?| 2621440 ?} (5 . ?{) (?~ ?ÿ) 3))) font-lock-set-defaults-1() font-lock-mode(nil) call-interactively(font-lock-mode) command-execute(font-lock-mode t) execute-extended-command(nil) call-interactively(execute-extended-command) Ville> Hints how to properly fix this are welcome. Don't know the correct fix yet, but a string of characters is not acceptable. Footnotes: [1] "XEmacs 21.4 (patch 14) \"Reasonable Discussion\" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32) of Sun Sep 14 2003 on D5DC120J" -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/