Re: Speed difference in Gnus

Uwe> I also start to wonder where the problem lies? so far copying Uwe> 80 msg from imap folder to imap folder did not show a Uwe> significant difference in speed between gnus emacs and Uwe> xemacs, *however* when I try to copy 160 msg then gnus emacs Uwe> needs nearly twice the time compared to the 80 while xemacs Uwe> simply get stuck and I have to abort. I may try to Uwe> interpolate between the 80 and 160 msg in order to see where Uwe> the two start to diverge. We would greatly appreciate it if you would do that. If the copying goes via XEmacs/Gnus (as opposed to simply being an IMAP command), then it is possible that there is a single message that is confusing XEmacs for some reason. If we could identify that, then we can probably fix a bug. Similarly, it is possible that at some byte count (close to a multile of the size of a buffer, for example) XEmacs gets wedged. Steve -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.