Doc(?) bugs in 21.4 (lispref, CCL)

Hi all, In preparation for hunting down the utf8 bug in 21.4, I've been trying to get familiar with this thing called CCL. One thing I discovered is that the lispref is wrong. In section 63.7.4, Calling CCL, the function ccl-execute is incorrectly described as taking a 9 element status vector. It only takes an 8 argument vector, the IC is just left out. This is for 21.4, btw. The function ccl-execute-on-string (correctly) takes a 9 element status vector. On the other hand, I have not yet ascertained that the treatment of the IC is accurate, both regarding the status vector and the optional continue argument. I have no opinion whether the lispref should be updated to reflect reality, or whether reality should be updated to reflect the documents. It is of course easier to update the documents. How do you want to treat this? Johann _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta