Re: Sounds -- .au, .wav, or both?
Some time ago, Oscar Figueiredo wrote...
|+
| >>>>> "kkm" == Kirill M Katsnelson <kkm(a)kis.ru> writes:
|
| [...]
| kkm> [2 bark-PCM-8bit-8KBps-1ch.wav <audio/microsoft-wave>]
|
| According to ftp.isi.edu:/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/media-types,
| the official IANA list of assigned media types, `audio/microsoft-wave' is not a
| valid media type, you should use audio/x-wav instead (the x- prefix meaning
| it's an unofficial media type).
Globally, .wav in Windows is associated with audio/wav (not x-wav). Tough and
smart Eudora pukes on that, and uses its own type: "audio/microsoft-wave".
This is beyond my control.
Btw, is that IANA document the lates one? Ususally, Microsoft RFCes its own
protocols and protocol extensions as informational RFCs. I guess "audio/wav"
might be around somewhere.
Kirill