[Richard Stallman <rms@santafe.edu>] Dynamic linking and the GNU GPL
RMS writes:
I've heard that the next release of XEmacs is going to come
with a dynamic linking facility. People might be tempted
to use this facility to write proprietary C programs which
are extensions of XEmacs--which would violate the GNU GPL.
Since when are extensions to XEmacs required to be GPL'd?
I don't see much difference between dynamically loaded .o files
and dynamically loaded .elc files.