Re: enable-foo vs. with-foo is illogical
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:52:31AM -0500, Ben Wing wrote:
I'm a little confused. What is the objection to just using
`with-foo'
always, and never using `enable-foo' at all, no aliasing provided?
1- I'd find annoying to have to change my configure-calling scripts
_again_ (but I'll survive)
2- I really, really don't want us to have to go through that crap
again in 6-12 months. Always with-foo was the situation before
whoever changed it. So it must have not been the right thing for
some (unfathomable to me) reason.
OG.