Re: XBM support [was Re: XEmacs on NT: Personal experience]
At 04:17 PM 5/27/98 +0400, you wrote:
Some time ago, Andy Piper wrote...
|+
| I'm not going to get time to do this[1] for 21.0. It also involves a
lot of
| code reorgnaization with glyphs.c like xpm did. I don't think
that's a
good
| idea at this stage.
|-
This going to be a sad story. Many lisp packages already adhere to xbms,
so this would delay migration of these packages to NT. Maybe if Steve
allowed a special break-in for this feature through the current freeze,
Andy could do this?
I can do it - but I also remember the grief when xpm got generalised.
Steve's call. It will touch console.h, glyphs.c, glyphs.h, glyphs-msw.c and
glyphs-x.c.
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp