Re: Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues

Mike Kupfer writes:

> Well, issue53 was marked committed before it was closed (with Reason > left unset). So yes it was a valid issue, but does it need to be > reopened? Yes. There are still open tasks in that issue. They could be moved to separate issues, but probably almost nobody but me cares how tracker issues are organized. > A similar comment applies to issue634. Adrian's last comment was that the new behavior is arguably a regression. It doesn't *need* to be open, but it probably is better left open until somebody who can judge does judge.

On the bright side of all this, I've learned a bit about SQL. :-)