Didier Verna writes:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Erm, that's precisely where a lot of the pain with gnutls was!
Maybe it was a question of running it on Macs then, not sure anymore.
OK, we'll take it on faith that gnutls has its advantages.
It doesn't really matter; Emacs is using gnutls (for political
reasons, but there's nothing we can do about that), so that's where we
should start. gnutls has an OpenSSL compatibility API, and if that's
not good enough for somebody's OpenSSL-based application, they can
implement an OpenSSL module or configure option, with the advantage of
having a (hopefully mostly working) OpenSSL API already integrated and
with a Lisp API as reference for design.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta