Re: Comparative performance
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
SL Baur writes:
> The area that we're still weak(est) at, performance wise, IMO, is
> startup time. At least it's the most noticeable.
Talk to Mike, the stat guy. The main slowdown is in finding the
packages which cost a lot of stats.
The number of stats we do is pretty much minimal. Actually, an "xemacs
-q" comes up plenty fast for me. Like many others, `font-lock' and the
more-than--linear time it takes to construct Gnus summary buffers bother
me most.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta