Re: Sub-process pblms with 32-bit Cygwin builds
ht writes:
I'm seeing some things I don't understand, and are therefore
_perhaps_
suspicious:
1)
b29 has:
[main] PID1 sigprocmask: 0 = sigprocmask(2647444, 0xNULL, 0xNULL)
where b32 has:
[main] PID1 sigprocmask: 0 = sigprocmask(2649272, 0xNULL, 0xADDR)
Either I don't understand strace output, or this is bizarre -- the
first arg to sigprocmask should always be 0, 1 or 2, right?
Querying this on cygwin list clarifies that this is an strace bug,
so nothing to see here, move along.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta