Re: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again

SL Baur wrote on 21-July-1999: ->Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com&gt; writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: -> ... ->> Cool. The next thing to figure out now is why Steve can duplicate ->> the problem even when allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame is t. -> ->I can't. What I cannot duplicate is Hrvoje's results with WindowMaker. ->Regardless of the value of `allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame', I ->can C-x 5 0 a frame when another frame is open in another workspace, ->i.e. WindowMaker always does the Right Thing. -> ->I just retested with CDE and if I manually set the value to t, then ->everything works as expected. OK, here's another viewpoint/statistic: allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame t C-x 5 0 works when another frame is open in another workspace allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame nil C-x 5 0 _fails_ when another frame is open in another workspace (Attempt to delete last or iconified frame) The "X" (kill/close thing) button in the window title bar works I think I'm agreeing with what Hrjove sees. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Some sysinfo gristle $ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo) gristle $ uname -a Linux gristle.niss.ac.uk 2.2.10 #2 Thu Jun 17 11:36:26 BST 1999 i686 unknown gristle $ rpm -q WindowMaker WindowMaker-0.60.0-4 gristle $ rpm -q gnome-core gnome-core-1.0.4-13rh gristle $ xemacs --version XEmacs 21.2 (beta18) "Toshima" [Lucid] (i686-pc-linux) of Wed Jul 14 1999 on gristle.niss.ac.uk Build report: http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-build-reports/9907/msg00021.html Any other info you need? nic