[gnu.emacs.vm.info] Re: upgrading via xemacs?

In cases where the package author is willing to maintain an XEmacs package, but has his/her own distribution channels, is there a reason we _must_ actively maintain sources in xemacs-packages? I bet Steve Youngs would be just as happy if he could create SUMOs by doing a package-ui-like download of VM to the SUMO tree, and have users' package-get-base refer to Kyle's distribution points somehow: -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."