Andreas Röhler writes:
> it still runs into the fact that this is redundant.
In which respect?
The whole function is redundant, as the main functionality (and much
more) is implemented in whitespace.el.
OTOH: why not implement a more powerful form if it's ready?
On the gripping hand, a much more powerful form is already implemented
in whitespace.el, and for most XEmacs users is as far away as M-x
whitespace-global-mode (it's autoloaded from an installed package).
IMO, if one wants specific tweaks not already in whitespace.el, it's
better to propose improvements to whitespace.el that benefit those
users too, not additions that for 99% of actual usage duplicate
existing functionality of XEmacs, and will mostly likely never be used
by whitespace.el users.
If people really want this function in core, I won't veto it. But
it's a bad idea IMO for the reasons I've given (and others --
simple.el is dumped, for one), and nobody has bothered to address
them. That makes me sad. This project used to *care* about code
quality.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta