Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> > [this is incompatible with Emacs, and there is no hope to
> > persuade RMS to do this, and it is "a sudden change of
> > behaviour" etc. so I would be surprised is there were even a
> > single person supporting this :-]
>
> This sounds like a good idea to me, for one. Yes, it's a new thing,
> but it only affects the users who set debug-ignored-errors.
And the change is quite minimal too. I like it.
Also, `debug-on-error' already accepts "magical" values other than
t/nil, so we already have a precedence.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}