Re: Is xemacs' etags.el really "better and faster"?
Vin Shelton <acs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Snazzier certainly. Zippier I find very hard to believe.
Many aspects of XEmacs have been optimized, most notably the Lisp
engine.
Startup could be slower, and all syntax-related stuff has slowed down
due to the syntax changes.