Re: Hideshow
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
You of all people should know better.
Yeah, well, you try to think straight when your coffee's getting cold,
the kids are screaming at you, your wife wants more money to buy god
knows what, and you can't find your smokes!
But, alas, you're correct. I apologise for the "clouded"
information.
What we should do is find a few volunteers to run without fsf-compat
installed and see what breaks and how hard to fix it would be, then
talk about the next step.
OK, I have just removed fsf-compat here. Of the packages that
"require" it, I have these ones installed...
ecb pgg perl-modes psgml-dtds ess liece latin-unity mmm-mode tramp
text-modes mail-lib edit-utils leim psgml ilisp reftex prog-modes
semantic bbdb mailcrypt apel
I'll keep you posted as to how it goes.
An afterthought: Would PUI benefit if we split the $REQUIRES into
"$BUILD_REQUIRES" and "$RUN_REQUIRES"? And I bet that wouldn't be
as
easy as what I hope it would be. :-(
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 256 bytes)