(no subject)
Dear Xemacs Folk,
I read your description of the differences between Xemacs and GNU Emacs
and the reply of Richard Stallman on the same web page. I read
your description as a catalog of technical issues. I read Stallman's as
a
request for legal papers in accord with the GPL. At the risk of stating
the
obvious, to say you diverge on technical issues seems to miss the point
of
Stallman's request. He does not question the technical choices you
make,
but asks only that you provide legal papers in accord with the GPL.
Why don't you respond on that issue in the discussion on your web page?
I would like to hear your views on that.
James Risbey
-- -----------------