Re: a neat idea from Paul Eggert on emacs-devel
Jerry James writes:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> What do you all think? We don't use autogen.sh, but we could create
> one and/or adjust the Makefile. I'm pretty sure that the features
> used in this GNUMakefile are all ancient in GNU Make.
I pass so many options to configure, that I keep a set of script files
containing the various invocations I use.
Any of them that should be defaults IYHO?
I wouldn't find it useful to run a bare ./configure.
Oh, me too. I'm thinking in terms of people just getting started.
I guess part of the value of having this discussion would be thinking
about how close we can get to a useful "bare ./configure".
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta