Rick Campbell wrote:
From: Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:29:51 +0000 (GMT)
On Linux, I think that precompiled binaries really need to be done by
people who are familiar with the various distributions.
Are you suggesting a seperate build for every distribution?!?
Quite possibly. Most .deb and .rpm packages are built from the stock
source distribution by someone who uses the target distribution
themselves, rather than from some common binary. In addition, the
different versions may have been configured differently, or even
patched to deal with shadow passwords, PAM etc.
I don't think that it's particularly realistic to think of `Linux' as
an OS in the same sense as commercial Unices. RedHat, Debian,
Slackware etc may use the same kernel, and may all use the GNU tools,
but the different camps don't seem particularly concerned about going
their own way when they feel like it (glibc, PAM, KDE/Gnome, BSD/SysV
init scripts, ...). Inter-distribution compatibility can sometimes
seem to be more a matter coincidence than an explicit goal.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>