Re: Dynamic size spec for widgets
Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes:
At 09:19 AM 2/24/00 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>Notice how in almost all files INLINE is #defined to _extern_ inline,
>not to static or static inline as one would assume. This is so that
>the inline functions defined in headers work right.
RIght, inline IMHO should almost always be used in headers. If you
define inline functions in a source file (as per redisplay-msw.c)
any decent compiler should inline them declared as static
anyway.
Oh, I don't know about that. I'd still like to be able to just
specify INLINE, meaning `static inline' or whatever is appropriate.
You can't do that at all with the current setup.
For instance, `gcc -O2' (or, for that matter, `gcc -O') doesn't inline
any functions, but it does inline the ones specifically requested.
`gcc -O3' inlines all it can, but was reported as buggy under some
architectures.