Re: GPLv3/L8R -- what about the texi files?

Stephen> Please distinguish between "copyright" and "permission". Sorry, and thanks for putting me right again and again because I'm sloppy with the terms. I mean the license of course! (It is more or less that you should perform an s/copyright/license/ before reading my mail ;-)) Stephen> You should not be changing any copyright notices in the GPLv3 Stephen> branch. I don't think we have done that either, if not by misstake. There are some files involved. Stephen> For the info files, nothing. [...] So all info files can be untouched and we can still go GPLv3 or later with the rest? Stephen> For the docs in etc/ (and a couple of files in the root: PROBLEMS, Stephen> INSTALL, README), add the standard notice. OK. I'll have a closer look. Among these we have the TUTORIALS which according to Jerrys GPLv3-analysis has the "old FSF documentation license". Any problem with that? Stephen> I'm not sure what to do about ChangeLogs. What does the FSF Stephen> do? I haven't checked. I'll do that. Stephen> What else is there? I'll try to summarize what we have been doing soon. Most easy cases are handled but some tricky cases remain. Cases which might not be tricky at all if you know whar you are doing. Developers can feel free to clone the GPLv3 repo in order to inspect or contribute. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta