Re: More package breakage
Stephen, could you take care of this the way you see appropriate?
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:40, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> SJT> Whoever played with the mule-ucs package recently
arranged for
> SJT> one ChangeLog to overwrite another, and cp complains:
> I'd fix it by renaming lisp/ChangeLog to
lisp/ChangeLog.upstream and
> change $EXTRA_SOURCES accordingly.
That isn't quite a real fix, lisp/ChangeLog is not only a "upstream"
one, and renaming it will cause trouble with add-log and friends.
IMO, removing lisp/ChangeLog from EXTRA_SOURCES would be a better "fix"
for now. When making the discussed changes to installed package layouts
later(tm), this should be really taken care of.
--
\/ille Skyttä
scop at xemacs.org