Why do we have to use URL syntax if it is inconvenient? Wouldn't
"/ftp:user@host:/path/to/file" work, too?
Personally, I don't find that any better than
ftp://user@host/path/to/file
It even has the exact same number of characters!
But most importantly, URL syntax is *standard*. Really, honestly, that
does matter. The world has given us a standard way to name documents
all over the Internet, with a variety of protocols. Every Web user
understands it. Can't we please use it?
Anyway, obviously full URLs are inconvenient. So again, I suggest a
convenience syntax, the EFS syntax
/user@host:path/to/file
which would use some user-settable protocol to resolve. That protocol
should by default be FTP, and no one would even know that EFS changed.
If you wanted to define yet another syntax in addition, it's no
problem for me, but that seems like overkill.
nelson(a)media.mit.edu
. . . . . . . .
http://www.media.mit.edu/~nelson/