Re: issues shown as "no priority set"
Arrgh. Stupid operator error. Ignore my comment re issue #2; it is not
in the no priority set list.
So, does this mean that "no priority set" should really say "some
classification fields missing"?
--- Vladimir
on 07/09/2008 01:50 PM Vladimir G. Ivanovic said the following:
OK, I don't get it. What criteria puts an issue in the "no
priority set"
list?
Some *do* have a priority set, e.g. #374, but show up in the "no
priority set" list when I select "Show Open". Many are missing an entry
in the Classification section, but issue #2, for instance, is in the "no
priority set" list and has all classifications fields set.
Is there rhyme or reason here?
--- Vladimir
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 197 bytes)