Re: *DO* dynamically link distributed executables
>>>> "Rick" == Rick Campbell
<rick(a)campbellcentral.org> writes:
Rick> For a variety of reasons, at least on some platforms -- Linux in
Rick> particular -- it's come down to there being a real need for seperate
Rick> static and non-static builds. My suspicion is that that need will
Rick> still be around for a while.
Maybe Linux didn't do as good a job on the backward compatibility
mechanism for shared libraries as Solaris did?
Martin