Re: a neat idea from Paul Eggert on emacs-devel
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
I suspect I don't really care if Itanium gets pdump. My
understanding
is that Itanium is a huge mess anyway because of the function pointer
issue. Has that changed?
As far as I know, no. (I forgot that pdump was the default already,
which is why I mentioned it in the first place.)
Which CPUs are Itanium, anyway? Just those explicitly branded
Itanium, or is that design used in more recent Intel offerings?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta