On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:06 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 >>>>> "Ville" == Ville Skytt <Ville>
writes:
 
     Ville> The binary package built with XEmacs 21.4.19 from what's
     Ville> currently in unsupported/scop/vc in CVS is available at
     Ville> 
http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/xemacs/new-vc/vc-0.01-pkg.tar.gz
 
 I have vc-0.03-pkg.tar.gz; I assume this is still causing problems for
 you? 
Yes, unless I remove auto-autoloads.elc.
     Ville> Minimal tarball containing one Subversion controlled
file:
     Ville> 
http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/xemacs/new-vc/svndir.tar.gz
 
 The file foo.txt is supposed to be empty, right? 
Yes, it doesn't matter what the file's contents are.
 For me, both packages have shown some abnormality, I get a "bad
byte
 code" error sometimes, but not in the last couple of tries.
 Unfortunately the backtrace doesn't print the byte code so I haven't
 been able to investigate directly yet.  Does "bad byte code" sound
 familiar? 
Remotely, yes, although I have got wildly varying errors and crashes,
nothing consistent so far.
 I do not get a crash, with the locally built vc or with your tarball.
:(.  Or :), depends on which way one looks at it.
 If you run xemacs 21.4 with 
[...]
Will reply separately to your other message on that.