Re: point-at-{eol,bol}
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
I see nothing wrong with `point-at-eol' and `point-at-bol'.
When Lars first suggested these functions, I asked why he didn't just
use the existing `eolp' and `bolp' functions. Thus, the names
confused _me_, no matter what the logic behind them is.