Re: Automatic smoketests

Ville> Makes sense to me. 21.1.14 is important to include in the Ville> tests because we still support packages on it (and will for Ville> some time), but the tester base isn't that large. OK. I'll set it up. Ville> Sounds neat. This, combined with a [HEADS UP] mail to some Ville> list if the build fails would be even better. I'm afraid that Ville> simply setting up the web pages doesn't draw enough Ville> attention... It should. I just don't like the idea with automatic emails to the beta list but maybe it could be limited to just a subject line like "hey we have got red builds now" and in the body just a link to the web page. Maybe it wouldn't disturb so much. I still think package developers should be convinced that it is a god idea to check the full build. Ville> That's already handled in my smoketest script, not by tailing Ville> but by examining the return code of each build task. Or did I Ville> miss a point here? I'm not sure I use your latest version. I have added a trailing line in my logs with the error code so that I could use that when creating the web-page. On the other hand if the developers isn't interested in the web page then the email might be a better thing to implement. Yours -- %% Mats