Re: Build failure for CVS 21.2 of 19990531 (with mule)

sb> Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp&gt; writes in sb> xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: sb> That was some time ago. Good point. Thing is, it's true I didn't keep up with recent changes, and I didn't use correct procedure in updating packages. The first is no sin, and the second is still all too easy a mistake to make---eg, people who use the SUMO tarbabies. I'm pretty sure that Tomo's changes creating the function in question were recent, so even somebody who noticed the move to <core>/lisp/mule at the time might get caught by the later change, as long as they were incautious about package updates---and since the wrong update procedure worked at the time, it's a hard one to figure out. Just another source of package-related panic-stricken users on c.e.x. Thank heaven for the library shadow finder. Hmm. Does the bug report function call it? That would be easy enough to do. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ What are those two straight lines for? "Free software rules."