Re: inconsistency in iso-acc.el
This change is O.K. with me.
Tudor Hulubei <tudor(a)cs.unh.edu> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
Hi,
The following 3 lines should be added to iso-acc.el in the
"latin-2"
mapping in order to fix an inconsistency in the way characters with a
cedilla under them are inserted. The affected characters are the
romanian "s" and "t" (with a cedilla).
Currently, these characters can be inserted by prefixing them with a
backquote, even though they should be prefixed with a comma, just like
the french "c" with a cedilla is.
(?, (?S . ?\252) (?T . ?\336)
(?s . ?\272) (?t . ?\376)
(?\ . ?,))
I would suggest leaving the backquote based sequences in place, for
those people who already got used to them.