Re: Memory corruption errors!?

> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Rychter <jan(a)rychter.com&gt; writes: > Jan> I did not realize that --enable-newgc is completely > Jan> independent from --enable-kkcc. If there is an intention of > Jan> keeping the old code around, perhaps better descriptions > Jan> should be provided in configure? (as in --with-gc=vanilla > Jan> for folks who want to go back to a working default) > > There is no guarantee of a working default in the beta series. > > The only way to get something close to a guarantee is a feature > freeze. We're not ready for that. I was just making a suggestion that would make life easier for some people. Yes, I know it's a beta, yes, I know there are no guarantees. I wasn't complaining, as you might have noticed, just suggesting.

Does the Beta-ness of the beta series mean we should not aim for well-documented config options?