* Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> writes:
Steve Youngs wrote:
>
> Not enough to have ever gotten a complete build report on either.
> Solaris has turned out to be a huge PITA for us. None of the active
> developers use it, and the couple of people who've reported problems
> with Solaris either don't have the time or the knowledge to help us
> fix it.
Well, I suppose that you are assuming that I don't read
xemacs-beta
every day. You would be wrong.
I don't understand how this comment is relevant. Whether or not you
read xemacs-beta makes no difference to me. It certainly has no
bearing on what I post here.
I can't believe I wasted the last couple of months helping you
guys fixing your stupid linux-centric bugs in sxemacs. Never
again!
I can't believe you have reacted this way. My intention was not to
offend you (or anyone else). I am very sorry.
Rodney, thank you very much for your time, efforts, and feedback
regarding SXEmacs and Solaris. It was greatly appreciated and
welcome.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| I am Dyslexic of Borg. |
| Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated. |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|