flyspell

From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp&gt; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:17:47 +0900 Jeff> So anyway, I was thinking that it would be more useful if Jeff> flyspell only checked comments in programming modes. Wouldn't it be yet more useful if flyspell cooperated with the mode and learned how to spell its keywords? Comments are full of stuff like "this defvar does ...". Sure - but that sounded more complicated and a lot harder to get right. Actually, now that I think about it, the language specific keywords are probably pretty easy to handle, but you would also have to do something to ignore the functions and variables defined and used in the code. For example, <flyspell> and <defs> is shown as misspelled in: (flyspell-accept-buffer-local-defs) The problem is that the whole word is correct or not depending on whether or not (defun flyspell-accept-buffer-local-defs ...) form. -jeff