Re: Combining Packages
Jake Colman <jake.colman(a)xemacs.org> writes:
I think that it might be in our interest to reduce the proliferation
of
extraneous packages where packages can be easily combined. Do we really all
three of these? Wouldn't it make more sense to deliver all of this in one
packages called, for example, misc-games?
I don't know whether there are historical reasons to keep them
separate. Some parts of misc-games are not really games in a strict
sense. IMO it would not harm to put the three packages together.
Although, I would opt for 'games' as name.
norbert.