Re: [reformated] Re: proposed Eistring interface
Hmm, yes, doprnt would probably need to be rewritten again.
"Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com>
writes:
>> > > - we'll need a kind of sprintf
>> > probably true ... but you could always pull out the raw data
>> > and use doprnt().
>>
>> Yikes. What about mule?
Ben> completely mule-safe. i know -- i rewrote it from scratch to
Ben> be this way.
You'd have to give up the claim about being transparent to use of
UCS-[24] as the internal representation, wouldn't you?
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
--
Ben
In order to save my hands, I am cutting back on my mail. I also write
as succinctly as possible -- please don't be offended. If you send me
mail, you _will_ get a response, but please be patient, especially for
XEmacs-related mail. If you need an immediate response and it is not
apparent in your message, please say so. Thanks for your understanding.
See also http://www.666.com/ben/typing.html.