Michael Albinus writes:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> > tramp-gw, which are invalid. Wouldn't it be better to generate
> > tramp-loaddefs.el in the package repository?
>
> No. The XEmacs package build process automatically collects autoloads
> into a file called auto-autoloads.el. XEmacs shouldn't use
> tramp-loaddefs even if it does exist.
Unfortunately, it is not so simple. Tramp uses two different autoload
cookies: ";;;###autoload" and ";;;###tramp-autoload". The former one
is
collected into auto-autoloads.el. The latter one must be collected into
a file tramp-loaddefs.el, which is required by the other Tramp files.
What is the purpose of this division? Autoloads are not that
expensive if you don't actually call the functions.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta