Re: Speed difference in Gnus
>>>> "David" == David Kastrup
<dak(a)gnu.org> writes:
>
>>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <dak(a)gnu.org>
writes:
>>
David> M-x elp-results RET
>>
>> Thanks, this function also exists in xemacs (and I did not know
>> about it), in any case the information is very aehm spare:
>
> You should probably also instrument the `nnml', `imap', `mm' and
`mml'
> packages (and maybe some more depending on which operation you're
> benchmarking -- I don't recall).
David> And it helps to run the test first before instrumenting it: that way
David> not only the autoloads get instrumented.
Ok, thanks, I think now more or less I know how to proceed. As I said
before the situation is sort of strange: for a certain amount of msg,
say n, both emacsen are almost equal, gnu emacs a little faster, once
the number of msg > n, then xemacs got stacked.
I should add, that the information of the elp packages is detailed the
profile-command of xemacs gives far more information. I don't know how
important profiling is for emacs, but may that pkg could be ported?