Marcus Harnisch writes:
Sure. I am not talking about doing something for others only.
We'd do
ourselves a favor. Lifting our toolkit into year 2k would be a
win.
Well, now that you're talking about writing the code yourself, that's
a different matter entirely. :-)
All I'm saying, and I believe Julian is saying the same thing, is that
the Xt-based port works best for me now. For my own needs, I expect I
will continue to use an Xt build and work mostly on that and Xft
improvements, and maybe the Mac port, until GTK is clearly at least as
good for me.
At present, it clearly is not. The best I can say about the Mac GUI
is that it rarely gets in my way. I doubt I could say that about GTK,
and in any case XEmacs doesn't implement all that good stuff yet, and
it doesn't come for free. Somebody has to jump through the hoops
writing the code, and *only then* can you avoid jumping through hoops
at run time, no? I'm just saying that I'm not going to be writing
that code any time soon, and that I don't want the code that I still
use to be removed in favor of some notion of making the code more
maintainable or whatever.
BTW, I do work with XEmacs displaying windows on workstations with
very different displays *simultaneously* about once a week, maybe
every other week. As I say, I could do it some other way, but I'm
used to this way of working, and it would be unnecessary effort to do
it differently.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta