Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] AUCTeX 11.84 released

ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: You wish. Search for mentions of AUCTeX on the list and you'll find enough whining and exasperation by yours truly to convince you otherwise. The message is that there are not enough AUCTeX users giving the impression that they would bother enough about a working and/or uptodate AUCTeX that the XEmacs developers would reconsider their policies of not allowing ready-built packages from elsewhere into Sumo. Only things built in the XEmacs package tree are allowed, and nobody with access to that tree at the current point of time would be interested into making the hallowed XEmacs infrastructure reproduce the binary package that AUCTeX builds. XEmacs users can pick up an uptodate ready-built XEmacs package from the AUCTeX download site, and that's the best we can do for you. More than that would have to be done by XEmacs developers, and none is interested. Not in allowing somebody else's finished package into distribution, not in mimicking the build within XEmacs' own framework. Too bad, but that's life. At least for XEmacs users. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta